trying to work around an arbitrary API limitation with a hack
parent
95b38a39dd
commit
8c0abb092a
|
@ -20,21 +20,25 @@ public class QuizHandler {
|
||||||
Message message = user.sendMessage("Hi! I'm Hacky.\n"
|
Message message = user.sendMessage("Hi! I'm Hacky.\n"
|
||||||
+ "I will be sending you a bunch of multiple-choice questions. "
|
+ "I will be sending you a bunch of multiple-choice questions. "
|
||||||
+ "You can answer by selecting one or more of the reactions on the message and confirm your selection by selecting the :white_check_mark: reaction."
|
+ "You can answer by selecting one or more of the reactions on the message and confirm your selection by selecting the :white_check_mark: reaction."
|
||||||
+ " Please contact @BodgeMaster#0344 if there are any issues.\n"
|
+ " Please contact @BodgeMaster#0344 if there are any issues.\n\n"
|
||||||
+ "\n"
|
|
||||||
+ "Select the :white_check_mark: reaction to continue.").get();
|
+ "Select the :white_check_mark: reaction to continue.").get();
|
||||||
message.addReaction(EmojiParser.parseToUnicode(":white_check_mark:"));
|
message.addReaction(EmojiParser.parseToUnicode(":white_check_mark:"));
|
||||||
message.addReactionAddListener(event -> {
|
message.addReactionAddListener(event -> {
|
||||||
System.err.println("We get to here. #1");
|
// HACK: Testing for an exception to find out whether the event was caused by a
|
||||||
User test = event.getUser().get(); //test to see if this throws an exception
|
// user or by the bot itself because reactions added by the bot allow to check
|
||||||
System.err.println("We get to here. #2");
|
// for user where reactions added by actual users don’t.
|
||||||
System.err.println("Got an event from "+Long.toString(event.getUser().get().getId())); //this throws an exception - why?
|
try {
|
||||||
System.err.println("We get to here. #3");
|
if (!event.getUser().get().isYourself() && event.getReaction().get().getEmoji()
|
||||||
if (event.getUser().get().getId()!=Main.getUserID() && event.getReaction().get().getEmoji().equalsEmoji(EmojiParser.parseToUnicode(":white_check_mark:"))) {
|
.equalsEmoji(EmojiParser.parseToUnicode(":white_check_mark:"))) {
|
||||||
event.getMessage().get().getChannel().sendMessage("test");
|
event.getMessage().get().getChannel().sendMessage(
|
||||||
//TODO: trigger question dispatch
|
"This should not work. If you ever see this message, please inform @BodgeMaster#0344 that there is more to this arbitrary limitation in the Discord API than expected.");
|
||||||
//TODO: remove ReactionAddListener
|
}
|
||||||
|
} catch (Exception e) {
|
||||||
|
System.err.println("Assuming the reaction event was caused by the user...");
|
||||||
|
System.err.println("User ID: "+this.user.getIdAsString()); //test if we can get the user ID that way
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
// TODO: trigger question dispatch
|
||||||
|
// TODO: remove ReactionAddListener
|
||||||
});
|
});
|
||||||
} catch (InterruptedException | ExecutionException e) {
|
} catch (InterruptedException | ExecutionException e) {
|
||||||
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
|
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue